home | about us | opinion | contact us

Member Opinion and Q&A

The main inspiration behind this member-based initiative is NewEnergyIndia.org’s belief that most practitioners in any industry at any point in time face similar challenges and deal with similar problems. And if all practitioners and enthusiasts come together to collectively brainstorm and deal with common challenges, it will result in collective good for the RE community. Therefore this Web resource can be only as vibrant as the community that constitutes it. So feel free to draw from this network (by submitting queries) and also participate in brainstorming on queries that your peers submit. All of this brainstorming will also be supplemented with research initiatives from the New Energy India research team comprising dedicated RE enthusiasts. This section is dedicated to member queries and responses:

Member Question:

- If some one wants to install Solar Panels (1 to 3 KW) + Wind Turbine (5 KW) for his own use or for demonstration purpose on his own land in Haryana, is any approval required from central/state government agency? If yes, then what are these approvals, and which agencies should be contacted?

 

Member Responses:

Response-I:

As such no approval is required for installation of solar panels and wind turbine  in stand alone mode (off-grid) on own land for demonstration and/or for personal/ community use in any part of the country. Certain fiscal and financial incentives are available on installation of solar and small wind aero-generators. The person concerned may  wish to contact Mr BS Yadav, Additional Director (Technical), who is the key person for renewables in Haryana at the following address.

 

Department of Renewable Energy, Haryana

Haryana Renewable Energy Development Agency (HAREDA) 
SCO No. 48, Sector-26, Chandigarh
Phone No: 0172-2790918,2791917
Fax No: 0172-2790928
E-Mail: hareda@chd.nic.in

http://www.hareda.gov.in/index.html

 

Response-II (Prof Ajay Chandak):

Wind generation is practicable only if the site falls under notified wind zones. Most of the wind generators are designed for 12 m/sec wind speed and wind power is proportional to cube of velocity. There have been many incidences that people go for wind power without verifying whether the site falls under the wind zone or not, and then find that they are getting negligible power. Solar PV and small wind generators, both are not only capital intensive but also carry huge running cost in terms of battery replacements. Typical cost figures are in the range of Rs 40 onwards per kWh.

 

Probably most practical approach to get power out of green source is through biogas plants and running generators on this biogas. There are variety of materials available, which can make up good feed for biogas plant.

 

As far as permissions, I do not think there are any laws at present for solar PV and small wind generator installations. For small wind generator, however a certification may be required from structural engineer to install tower.

Member Question:

- Is it possible for any solar collector to have "Aperture area" larger than "Reflector area"?

 

Member Responses/New Energy India Research Findings:

Here are some instances (technical papers) that provide evidence of solar collector designs with aperture area greater than reflector area.

Solar Concentrator Patent Document

Solar Concentrator for Industrial Process Heat

Khan’s Solar Oven

Do you have an opinion on this Member Query? Write to us...

Member Question:

- Is Solar PV Technology is a "Negative Energy" Technology considering the energy consumed not only in manufacturing of Cells, modules, panels, structure, but also in its sales, installation, servicing and other problems connected with the battery, electronic sets?

 

Member Responses/New Energy India Research Findings:

Response-I (Prof Ajay Chandak):

I was also researching on this issue for a long time and I am convinced that "Energy Payback" of solar PV systems in India is negative and hence it is net "Negative Energy" technology.  In the question, my peer member has not included batteries, which not only consumes lot of energy for manufacturing but also difficult to dispose off after useful life of 2 to 5 years. Its all about disposing off acid, lead and plastic and net "Environmental Impact" of solar PV system will also be negative.
 
After a lot of efforts, I could get feedback from only one PV cell manufacturer that their energy paybacks for the panel is 5 to 7 years. This did not include energy consumed by bought out items like aluminum frames, glass, fixtures, cables, electronic items etc. Energy consumption data for other accessories like batteries, cables, charge controllers, etc. is not available. Considering the fact that when battery charging system is used net output will be only 50% of the power produced (because of different losses during battery charging, discharging, losses of invertors etc.) in that case the payback for panel will be 10-14 years. If we add all other energy consumptions for accessories, it will surpass the useful life of the product by big margin. In a nutshell, Solar PV in current form is not "Green", it has negative paybacks for financial investment, energy investments and has negative environmental impact.
 
We also have to consider practical applicability. Solar PV cell manufacturer claims payback say 7 years on the basis of maximum usage. But if the user is say educational institute or a govt. deptt. then out of 365 days, the user is closed for min. 120 days (104 Sat. Sundays and other holidays) and max. possible utilization becomes 2/3rd of rated capacity. Add to this additional cloudy days and the scene further deteriorates. Best season is summers and all educational institutions have holidays. Hence one has to really consider the constraints on the user end and then find out the practical utilizable days and work out all calculations based on this and not what the manufacturers provide.
 
I am ready to challenge any company who claims that battery charging solar PV system has a positive energy payback. It's pity that solar lamps and street lights are the most promoted products by MNRE and all govt. agencies.

 

Response-II (Dr. Atul Chamola):

This is not the case, the estimated energy pay back period of the SPV systems are much less than their useful life time. Please refer the following papers by Prof Erik Alesema:

Life Cycle Assessment of PV technology: Current status and further needs

Energy payback for PV systems

 

Response-III (Technology Journalist based in New York)

The use of photovoltaic systems on a large scale in order to reduce fossil fuel consumption and greenhouse gas emissions requires that the energy associated with the construction, operation and decommissioning of PV systems be small compared with energy production during the system lifetime. That is, the energy payback time should be short. The energy intensity and cost of PV systems are closely related. At present the energy payback time for PV systems is in the range 8 to 11 years, compared with typical system lifetimes of around 30 years. About 60% of the embodied energy is due to the silicon wafers. As the PV industry reduces production costs and moves to the use of thin film solar cells the energy payback time will decline to about two years. Read the following articles:

The energy intensity of Photovoltaic systems

What is the energy payback for PV?

 

Response-IV (Aditi Pant)

By all calculations solar electricity generation large scale production is expensive to begin with, but with a  life time of 25 years maintenance-free running, the economic seems cheap and viable. 

 

Do you have an opinion on this Member Query? Write to us...

Member Question:

- What are the key differences in the renewable energy set-up and status in India and China?

 

Member Responses/New Energy India Research Findings:

Though India clearly had a head-start over China in the renewable energy sector (especially wind energy, given the pace at which things are moving in the two countries, it is just a matter of time before China overtakes India in the total installed capacity and net annual additions. Taking the case of wind energy, industry in the two countries is quite similar — most of the global manufacturers of wind turbines have a manufacturing presence in the two, either through joint ventures or on their own. Where India is different is that its market leader is a domestic manufacturer — Suzlon — which has aggressively expanded its presence not just within the country but abroad too and also across the spectrum of turbine manufacture. In China, the domestic turbine industry now accounts for less than half the turbines installed.

 

Wind energy capacity

Consider the figures recently released by the Global Wind Energy Council, an international forum for the wind energy sector: Over 20,000 MW of wind power was added in the world in 2007 led by the US, China and Spain. China added 3,449 MW during the year and now ranks fifth in installed wind energy capacity with over 6,000 MW at the end of 2007. In comparison, India added 1,730 MW during 2007 taking its total installed capacity to about 8,000 MW, enough to retain its fourth position globally in terms of total installed capacity.

 

Enabling laws

China has in place a renewable energy law, while India is still a long way off from enacting a similar legislation. More importantly, though there are a handful of industry associations there is hardly any comprehensive status report available. In India there is no uniformity in policies across the States, right from the tariffs that are offered to the period of the power purchase agreements that State utilities are prepared to sign with the developers. This puts off investors, for whom the first level of comfort is continuity in policy. Investors look for a reasonable return on investment and some sort of cover for the risks. Each State follows a different policy as far as renewable energy, more particularly wind energy, is concerned.

 

Different providers

Unlike in China, where wind energy projects are tendered out based on tariffs, in India wind energy projects are put up by either private power utilities who are under an obligation to satisfy renewable portfolio standards — that is having a percentage of the electricity they distribute from green sources — or those who put them up for captive consumption, an insulation from costly and unreliable grid power.

 

Do you have an opinion on this Member Query? Write to us...

Member Questions:

- What are the factors that affect the useful life of SHP equipment in Himachal? How much is the typical useful life of equipment?

- What are typical operation and maintenance costs associated with SHP in Himachal Pradesh over the useful lifetime?

- Is there any publicly available source of information that provides some statistics on the above issues?

 

Member Responses/New Energy India Research Findings:

Useful Life of SHP Stations

If in a hydro power plant, the machines are properly manufactured, assembled and maintained, these can provide  trouble free service of between 30 years and 35 years or even more, except for underwater parts of silt effected power plants which may require more extensive repair/early replacement. By redesigning and retrofitting some components of these machines, enhanced and reliable life of additional 15 to 20 years and higher capacity/better efficiency can be achieved. Some parts of machine such as core stampings, rim, spider, poles, shafts, embedded parts, have a very longer life as compared to other parts such as AVR, stator and rotor windings (refer RM&U of Hydro Power Plants whitepaper). The Himachal Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission's (HPERC's) notification dated 10 October 2007 provides useful life data for all hydro power plant equipment for depreciation purposes (refer Annexure-I in the HPERC Notification). PPAs however are typically signed for a 30 year period, after which plants require considerable renovation, modernization, and uprating.

 

O&M Costs Associated with SHP stations

According to the HPERC's notification O&M costs are fixed at 1.5% of the capital costs with an annual escalation of 4% (refer Page 15 of HPERC Notification and November 2007 MPERC Discussion Paper on SHP Tariffs). Project developers and financial institutions however assume O&M costs at 2.5% with 6% escalation, which seems more realistic (refer July 2006 Suman Sarwari Project Information Memorandum). 

 

Public Sources of Information

Indicative numbers are available with the HP State Electricity Board, HP Electricity Regulatory Commission, and Financial Institutions such as IREDA and Power Finance Corporation. 

 

Do you have an opinion on this Member Query? Write to us...

 

Member Question: What is the 2008-09 Budget impact on renewable energy sector?

 

Member Responses/New Energy India Research Findings: The 2008-09 Budget is as expected – for the masses. This “typical election year Budget” gives renewable energy sector a pass. Finance Minister’s (FM’s) announcements that may “obliquely” however influence the renewable energy sector and climate change arena include:

 

- Marginally more outlay for renewable energy-based infrastructure projects. FM has proposed to raise the corpus of Rural Infrastructure Development Fund-XIV in 2008-09 to Rs 140 billion. The Government has also approved the continuation of the Rajiv Gandhi Grameen Vidyutikaran Yojana during the Eleventh Plan period with a capital subsidy of Rs 280 billion. The FM has proposed to allocate Rs 55 billion in 2008-09 for the Yojana.

 

- Focused institutional mechanism to promote clean technologies. FM hints at a "common but differentiated responsibility" to promote clean technology products, review fuel emission and efficiency regulations, replace wood by solar as the fuel of common use, encourage use of gas which is the most benign hydrocarbon, set up a trading platform for carbon emissions, and build sustainable greenfield cities.

 

- “More efforts” towards evaluation of the climate change impact. According to the FM, work is in progress to appoint an expert committee to study the impact of climate change on India and identify measures that the Government may have to take in the future ( this was incidentally promised in the last Budget Speech as well!)

 

- Possible impact in customs duty on some project imports. More clarity is needed on this announcement as the FM has proposed to reduce the customs duty on project imports from 7.5 per cent to 5 per cent, while also proposing to impose a 4 per cent special CVD on a few specified projects in the power sector.

 

Do you have an opinion on this Member Query? Write to us...

Your Opinion

What are key stall-points in the India RE story?

 

Despite being the only country with a dedicated ministry for renewable energy (RE), India has added only about 10,000 MW RE capacity in the last several decades. What is impeding RE growth in India -- what are the policy obstacles, how can we overcome the price disadvantage; how can private investment be encouraged, and what  is it needed to take technology to the next level…

 

We at New Energy India value your opinion. Click here to send in your response, and participate in this debate.  

Davos - Speech by Rajendra Pachauri - IPCC Chief

Excerpts from speech by the IPCC Chairman, Mr. Rajendra Pachauri, at the World Economic Forum in Davos, 23 January 2008...

 "The year 2007 saw an unprecedented increase in awareness related to global warming  and climate change. This explosion of knowledge and awareness resulted from a  number of factors, not the least of which is the release of the Fourth Assessment Report of  the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). The Norwegian Nobel  Committee highlighted the threat of climate change to global peace by awarding the 2007  Nobel Peace Prize to the Panel and Mr. Al Gore. But today we also know on the basis of  our reports that climate change, if unmitigated, can have serious implications for the economic well-being of human society. It would be convenient to submerge this reality under the financial problems the world is facing this week, but we would indeed be doing so at the peril of ignoring the world’s most pressing problems.

 

The IPCC carries out comprehensive assessments of all aspects of climate change on an inclusive, transparent and objective basis. It accomplishes this by harnessing the best talent from round the globe, following a process of rigorous peer reviews and final acceptance of all reports by governments through a process of consensus.

 

Why has the latest report made such an impact on the minds of the public and of leaders drawn from different fields of endeavour and different regions of the world? The answer lies in the fact that knowledge and the science related to climate change have progressed substantially in the last six years since the Third Assessment Report (TAR) was released. Hence, our findings this time are stronger, the gaps in existing knowledge much narrower and uncertainties substantially lower. Some of the major findings from this report are:

1. “Warming of the climate system is unequivocal, as is now evident from observations of increases in average air and ocean temperatures, widespread melting of snow and ice, and rising average sea level”.

2. Also much stronger and sharper is the finding related to the human influence on climate change as conveyed in the statement “Most of the observed increase in temperatures since the mid-20th century is very likely due to the increase in anthropogenic GHG concentrations”.

 

However, despite the global community having agreed to combating anthropogenic climate change through universal acceptance of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) as far back as in 1992, global GHG emissions continue to increase, with a substantial jump of 70% between 1970 and 2004. Within a long-term perspective the atmospheric concentrations of CO2 and CH4 in 2005 exceeded by far the natural range over the last 650,000 years. The last time the polar regions were significantly warmer than present for an extended period (about 125,000 years ago), reductions in polar ice volume led to 4 to 6 metres of sea level rise.

read complete speech...

With finite reserves of conventional energy... 

Excerpted from an article by JK Gupta...

With finite reserves of conventional energy sources such as crude oil, coal and gas, and increasing pressure from environmentalists to cut emissions, the world is seriously looking at alternative sources of clean energy. The surge in prices of conventional energy sources in the recent years has only hastened the process. For instance, crude oil is hovering over $100 a barrel, while its cascading effect on pricing of coal, gas and other forms of energy inputs have reached the zenith. 

 

For India, over the last few decades, the demand for power and transportation fuels has increased significantly, primarily due to high economic growth, rising urbanization and rapid industrialization. This demand is expected to rise further going ahead. 

 

According to a Planning Commission report on the Integrated Energy Policy, for India to maintain its GDP growth of 8 per cent a year for the next 25 years, the country would be required to increase its power generation capacity to 800,000 mw compared with the current capacity of 160,000 mw (including captive plants). 

 

While this not only provides an opportunity, it also brings along a big challenge considering that the conventional sources of energy such as coal and gas for power generation are limited, besides the concerns over rising prices and environmental degradation caused by such inputs. 

 

Since about 65 per cent of India’s power generation capacity is powered by coal, gas or oil, there are certainly more challenges to overcome before India’s dream of self sufficiency in power can be achieved. An equally daunting task is that of meeting India’s rising demand for transportation fuels, given that nearly three-fourths of the country’s crude oil needs are met through imports. 

 

In this perspective, and even though knowing that conventional energy will continue to account for a majority share, it makes sense to look at practical sources of alternative energy, wherein it is economically viable and its negative impact on environment is kept minimum. 

 

Alternative energy is understood as an energy source to replace fossil fuels, and is interchangeable with renewable energy, which effectively uses natural resources such as sunlight, wind, rain, tides and geothermal heat that are naturally replenished. Renewable energy technologies range from solar power, wind power, hydro electricity, biomass and biofuels for transportation. 

 

The India potential 

In India, the installed generation capacity from renewable energy has increased over ten-fold during the last decade to 9,220 mw or 7.3 per cent of the total installed capacity. India is estimated to have strong potential in terms of generation of renewable energy, mainly solar, biomass and wind power. As per projections of the Ministry of Non-Conventional Energy Sources, of the 240,000 mw total power capacity planned by 2012, about 24,000 mw will come from renewable sources of energy. 

 

This seems realistic given that India ranks in the top five in terms of wind and solar energy potential. In short, it indicates huge opportunity to invest in companies operating in the alternative energy space. 

 

But, before that, one needs to understand the risks associated with alternate energy. For instance, many of these opportunities become economically viable only after accounting for government assistance in the form of fiscal incentives and subsidies. They help lower the impact of the high capital cost involved with most alternative energy projects. For example, the capital cost for one mw in a solar-based project works out to Rs 12-15 crore, which is far higher as compared with Rs 4 crore for coal-based projects. Although the former enjoys virtually zero operating costs, any withdrawal of incentives will prove negative for the sectors growth. Second, if the price of conventional energy sources decline sharply, a few of these alternative sources of energy may not continue to be attractive. These are some factors, while unpredictable in nature, which need to be kept in mind. 

 

Wind energy 

According to the International Energy Agency, the share of wind power in total electricity generation, globally, will grow from 0.2 per cent in 2002 to 3 per cent by 2030. In the Indian context, the potential of wind power is pegged at 45,000 mw as compared to the current capacity of 7,660 mw. This, along with a much larger scope in international markets, should translate into huge opportunities for companies like Suzlon Energy. 

 

Suzlon Energy 

Significant size, highly diversified and well- integrated operations is what describes Suzlon Energy, which is among the world’s top five wind turbine manufacturer. The company also provides services like consultancy, design, operations, and maintenance for wind power projects. Suzlon generates a bulk of its income from the overseas markets such as Europe, US, South America and China, having offices and manufacturing facilities in these regions. 

 

In view of the strong demand in domestic and overseas markets, Suzlon is expanding its capacities, including an integrated manufacturing facility in China, a rotor blade plant in the US, and a forging and foundry plant in India. These will lead to an increase in its equipment manufacturing capacity from 2,700 mw to 5,700 mw by FY09. Its total order book of 3,358 mw, equivalent to Rs 17,110 crore, is equal to 2.1 times its FY07 revenue and thus, provides good revenue visibility. Although the outlook is robust driven by growing investments in renewable energy, especially wind power, there are some near-term concerns. 

 

The company’s earnings may be impacted on account of dollar depreciation (55 per cent of the order book is on account of US-based orders), increase in import duty on certain inputs in the US and firm commodity prices. Lastly, some impact on account of forex exposure is also anticipated for quarter ended March 2008. Nonetheless, analysts value Suzlon’s share at Rs 320 on the basis of sum of parts. Buy with a long-term perspective. 

 

Hydro energy 

With so many rivers in the country, there is little doubt over India’s potential with respect to generation of hydroelectric power. The same is estimated at 150,000 mw (current capacity at 33,941 mw). In order to narrow the gap between potential and actual, the government has undertaken several initiatives that should help add about 45,000 mw of hydropower capacity over the next ten years. In other words, it will open up opportunities for companies operating in the hydro power segment, such as Jaiprakash Hydro Power, Alstom Projects and, to some extent, Bhel, which derive a good chunk of its revenues from sale of hydro power equipment. 

 

Jaiprakash Hydro Power 

Hydro power player Jaiprakash Hydro currently operates a total capacity of 700 mw. Notably, it has mega plans wherein it aims to add 7,000 megawatts (5,000 mw of hydro and 2,000 mw of thermal power capacity) of new capacity by 2012, including the ongoing 1,000 mw project at Karcham, on Sutlej River in Himachal Pradesh. 

 

It’s expertise in the business, especially in terms of implementation of hydro projects (through the backing of its parent), places it in an advantageous position. That apart, the company should benefit from its recent diversification into the transmission business. While it has formed a joint venture with Power Grid Corporation for setting up a transmission line to evacuate power from its Karcham project, thereafter, other new transmission projects may also be considered. In terms of valuations, at the current price, the stock trades at 2.7 times its estimated FY 08 book-value and, merits attention. 

 

Alstom Projects India 

A subsidiary of Alstom SA France (a world leader in hydro power plants and mass rapid transport systems), Alstom Projects is a leader in the hydropower equipment business in India and commands a market share of 27 per cent. The company generates over 50 per cent of its revenues from the hydro power segment, while the rest comes from transport and others industries. 

 

In light of the rising demand, last year, the company doubled its hydropower equipment manufacturing capacity. Another indication of its prospects is it’s order book of Rs 3,200 crore, which works out to 2.5 times its FY07 revenue. 

 

There is significant hydro power capacity to be added over the next few years. Even at a conservative estimate of 30,000 mw of additional hydro capacity, the total investments required will be Rs 150,000 crore (at Rs 5 crore per mw). Of this, about 40 per cent or a staggering Rs 60,000 crore will be towards equipment. Needless to say, Alstom will be a key beneficiary. 

 

Solar energy 

Not only is the potential for solar energy high in India, solar power can be provided to remote areas even without the support of a power grid. According to industry estimates, the total domestic installed solar-based capacity is in excess of 100 mw as against the potential of 50,000 mw. Considering this and the support from the government, many players are considering entering this segment. Among the existing players that stand to gain include Webel SL Energy Systems and Moser Baer. 

 

Webel SL Energy Systems 

A leading producer of solar photovoltaic cells and modules, Webel SL Energy’ solar-based equipment manufacturing capacity is expected to rise from 10 mw to 42 mw by FY08 and to 102 mw by FY10. With this expansion, the management is targeting revenues of Rs 1,300 crore, as against revenues of Rs 107 crore in FY07. However, analysts conservatively estimate the company to clock revenues of Rs 625-650 crore by FY10. At present, Webel generates over 90 per cent of its revenue by exporting to markets like the US, Europe, Africa and Australia hence, it may get marginally impacted due to the weak dollar. 

 

The global solar industry is witnessing strong demand from countries like the US, Germany and Japan on account of high oil prices, government subsidies and environmental issues. On the back of this demand, players like Webel are expected to maintain a 30 per cent growth over the next five years. For Webel, its share price has tanked to Rs 241 after touching a 52-week high of Rs 846 in January 2008. At the current price, the stock trades at 17 and 11 times its estimated earnings for FY08 and FY09, respectively, and can deliver decent returns. 

 

Moser Baer 

Among key emerging players in the solar power space is optical storage disk maker Moser Baer. The company has forayed into manufacturing of solar photovoltaic (PV) cells in a big way, through its 100 per cent subsidiary (Moser Baer Photo Voltaic-MBPV). MBPV is investing about $1.5 billion to increase its photovoltaic cell manufacturing capacity to 600 mw by 2010, as against its current capacity of 40 mw. 

 

On April 3, this subsidiary signed a 10-year agreement with China-based, LDK Solar, for 

 

purchase of high-quality, multi-crystalline silicon wafers (used to produce PV cells) capable of generating 640 mw of solar power. This agreement will ensure reliable supply of raw materials to MBPV. In order to strengthen its roots in the business, MBPV will also investing in R&D. 

 

Lastly, in November 2007, the company signed an agreement with the Rajasthan government to set up a solar power generation facility in the state with a total capacity of 5 mw, estimated to cost of Rs 100 crore. In totality, while the solar-power business is relatively small in size as compared with Moser Baer itself, it has the potential to become bigger than its parent. 

 

According to analysts, the combined value of Moser’s businesses (optical media, home entertainment and PV) works out to Rs 350 per share. Given the potential in its various businesses, the stock, available at 7 times its estimated FY09 earnings, can deliver good returns. 

 

Ethanol 

The next emerging form of alternative energy is bio-fuel. According to industry estimates, there are remote possibilities of crude oil prices falling below $90-100 per barrel in the medium term. To overcome the cost pressure, many countries like Brazil (the world’s largest producer and exporter of sugar), are converting a big chunk of their sugar into ethanol for blending it with auto fuels. In India, though late, the government has made 5 per cent blending mandatory. Notably, from October 2008, the mandatory blending levels are slated to rise to 10 per cent. 

 

Praj Industries 

One of the beneficiaries of the growth potential in the ethanol space is engineering major, Praj Industries, the leader in ethanol equipment manufacturing technology. The company offers engineering products and solutions to produce bio-ethanol and bio-diesel, brewery plants and related waste-water treatment systems. The company has also made an entry into the fastest growing ethanol markets, Brazil, through a joint venture with Brazilian Engineering. The company is also expanding its manufacturing capacities at Kandla, Gujarat besides, making investments in R&D to develop newer technologies. Praj’s total order book stood at Rs 900 crore as on December 30, 2007, which is over 1.5 times its FY07 revenue, provides confidence. 

 

However, Praj is no exception as its stock has corrected sharply following the meltdown in stock markets. At the current price, the stock is available at 12 times its estimated FY09 earnings and, is attractively valued. 

 

Emerging areas 

Though in the nascent stages, there are other forms of alternative energy such as biomass, technology to convert waste plastic into power, biogas, geothermal power, etc. There are companies, which are exploring opportunities in these areas and may gain in the years to come. Asian Electronics is one such company, which is mainly into the lighting segment and has now developed a unique technology that will help convert waste plastic into power. The new initiative could prove extremely lucrative for Asian Electronics considering that it has an agreement with HPCL to process refinery bottoms into fuel. 

 

Likewise, players like Suryachakra Power, which is into biomass power, where power is produced by using rice husk, redgram stalk and cotton stalk as inputs. In India, the opportunities in biomass energy are yet to be tapped and this segment is estimated to have the potential of generating 19,500 mw of power as against the current capacity of 950 mw. Lastly, on a small scale, companies like NTPC have entered into the geothermal power, which is nothing but energy generated by heat stored beneath the earth's surface. While these emerging areas seem to have potential, it may take a while before we see investment opportunities. 

home | governance | technology | policy | finance | CDM | opinion | news | about us
© copyright 2008 newenergyindia.org, All rights reserved.